Emenence at ARG Design Competition

Good thing about EMENENTS is that the third letter is not I. Which means that if we claim emenence somewhere that doesn't necessarily mean that we were good.

At the Design Competition's first round - the last post I made was as a member of ARG - we fielded one-and-a-half cars. Or something like that. That we would have twice the chances of going through was tertiary at best. The governing motivation I described earlier, but allow me to redundantly reiterate: one car (kaar) for the present/near future; the prototype, with its electric driveline, for the futuristic and renewable energy future.

What, or rather how, we want to proceed with the two concepts is basically to encapsulate the same spirit which ARG is supposed to work. Instead of teams making different cars, we are teams working on chassis, body and drivelines, etc, giving us more focus in the fields our members have chosen. By a few causal relationships, that I don't feel like explaining, and which might be self-explanatory all the same, more focus means better cars and better engineers.

Where the ARG has stumbled, as it has been difficult to ignite the group as members are an eclectic bunch with generally diverse aims, EMENENTS would not.

ONWARDS EMENENTS!